CIA Triad in the Age of AI: Tinjauan Etika Profesi atas Konflik Anthropic–Pentagon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48144/suryainformatika.v16i1.2449Keywords:
AI Governance, AI Safety, CIA Triad, IT Professional EthicAbstract
Artikel ini menganalisis transformasi pilar keamanan informasi, Integrity, Confidentiality, dan Availability (CIA Triad), dalam konteks sistem kecerdasan buatan (AI) generatif dan agentic. Agentic AI merujuk pada sistem AI yang mampu mengambil keputusan dan menjalankan tindakan secara semi-otonom tanpa intervensi manusia secara langsung. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan analisis konseptual dan studi kasus kualitatif, penelitian ini mengevaluasi bagaimana ancaman siber kontemporer seperti prompt injection, data poisoning, dan serangan inferensi merekonfigurasi landasan etika profesi teknologi informasi. Sebagian besar penelitian terdahulu masih membahas CIA Triad pada sistem informasi konvensional dan cloud computing, sementara kajian dalam konteks AI generatif dan agentic serta etika profesi masih terbatas. Studi kasus berfokus pada konflik antara Anthropic dan Departemen Pertahanan Amerika Serikat (Pentagon) pada periode 2025–2026, yang mengekspos ketegangan antara kebijakan keselamatan AI korporasi dan tuntutan operasional militer. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa tanpa kerangka hukum dan tata kelola global yang memadai—sebagaimana disarankan oleh ISO/IEC 42001 dan NIST AI RMF—profesional TI akan terus menghadapi dilema etis yang berpotensi mengancam stabilitas keamanan nasional maupun keselamatan manusia secara luas
References
J. Jamaludin and R. Romindo, “Implementation of Combination Vigenere Cipher and RSA in Hybrid Cryptosystem for Text Security,” Int. J. Inf. Syst. Technol., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 471–481, 2020.
J. Jamaludin and R. Romindo, “Hybrid Cryptosystem Analysis by Using The Combination of Vigenere Cipher and RSA for Text Security,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 89–100, 2020, doi: 10.31098/ic-smart.v1i1.31.
Pratama, R. R. (2025). Tantangan etika profesi teknologi informasi di era digital dan kecerdasan buatan. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395457846
Alief, R., & Nurmiati, E. (2022). Penerapan kecerdasan buatan dan teknologi informasi pada efisiensi manajemen pengetahuan. Jurnal Masyarakat Informatika, 13(1), 59–68.
Opinio Juris. (2026). The Pentagon/Anthropic clash over military AI guardrails. https://opiniojuris.org/2026/02/26/the-pentagon-anthropic-clash-over-military-ai-guardrails/
Rehberger, J. (2024). Prompt injection and the CIA Triad in large language models. [Publikasi akademik].
Fortinet. (n.d.). What is the CIA Triad and why is it important? https://www.fortinet.com/resources/cyberglossary/cia-triad
Washington University in St. Louis. (n.d.). Confidentiality, integrity, and availability: The CIA Triad. Office of Information
Masoem University. (n.d.). Etika profesi teknologi informasi: Tanggung jawab moral seorang insinyur perangkat lunak. https://masoemuniversity.ac.id/artikel/etika-profesi-teknologi-informasi-tanggung-jawab-moral-seorang-insinyur-perangkat-lunak/
SailPoint. (n.d.). CIA Triad: Confidentiality, integrity, and availability. https://www.sailpoint.com/identity-library/cia-triad
Splunk. (n.d.). What’s the CIA Triad? Confidentiality, integrity, & availability, explained. https://www.splunk.com/en_us/blog/learn/cia-triad-confidentiality-integrity-availability.html
Kiteworks. (n.d.). CIA Triad: Confidentiality, integrity & availability for data protection.
ACM. (2018). ACM code of ethics and professional conduct. Association for Computing Machinery. https://www.acm.org/code-of-ethics
Audit and Risk. (n.d.). ISO 27001 and the CIA Triad: Pillars of information security. https://www.audit-and-risk.co.uk/iso27001-implementation/iso-27001-and-the-cia-triad-pillars-of-information-security/
TÜVSUD. (n.d.). ISO 42001 certification: Artificial intelligence management system. https://www.tuvsud.com/en-us/services/auditing-and-system-certification/iso-iec-42001-artificial-intelligence-management-system
Vanta. (n.d.). What is ISO 42001? Everything you need to know. https://www.vanta.com/collection/iso-42001/iso-42001-guide
Help Net Security. (2026). Prompt injection tags along as GenAI enters daily government use. https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/04/09/genai-prompt-injection-enterprise-data-risk/
Jiang, J., et al. (2025). Systematic survey on AI security and defense mechanisms. [Publikasi akademik].
Nastoska, I., et al. (2025). Connecting the dots in trustworthy AI: Trade-offs in multi-dimensional trust optimization. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02231
arXiv. (2023). Connecting the dots in trustworthy artificial intelligence. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02231
Hyperproof. (n.d.). Navigating the NIST AI Risk Management Framework. https://hyperproof.io/navigating-the-nist-ai-risk-management-framework/
Greene, F. P. (2025). Aligning NIST AI RMF with the CIA Triad. LogicGate. https://www.logicgate.com/blog/understanding-the-nist-ai-rmf-framework/
AIRC. (n.d.). AI RMF core. AI Risk and Compliance. https://airc.nist.gov/airmf-resources/airmf/5-sec-core/
LogicGate. (n.d.). Understanding the NIST AI RMF framework. https://www.logicgate.com/blog/understanding-the-nist-ai-rmf-framework/
Small Wars Journal. (2026). What’s behind the Anthropic–Pentagon dispute? https://smallwarsjournal.com/2026/03/04/anthropic-pentagon-ai-dispute-military-ai-safeguards/
Khalida, R., Rahmandri, A., Magren, S. A. M., & Nurmiati, E. (2025). Etika teknologi informasi dalam dunia pendidikan: Tinjauan literatur atas penggunaan AI dan isu plagiarisme akademik. Jurnal Saintekom: Sains, Teknologi, Komputer dan Manajemen, 15(2), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.33020/saintekom.v15i2.928
Scribd. (n.d.). Professional ethics & codes of conduct.https://www.scribd.com/document/707868793/pp
CFR. (2026). Anthropic’s standoff with the Pentagon is a test of U.S. credibility. Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/articles/anthropics-standoff-with-the-pentagon-is-a-test-of-u-s-credibility
Mayer Brown. (2026). Pentagon designates Anthropic a supply chain risk—what government contractors need to know. https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/insights/publications/2026/03/pentagon-designates-anthropic-a-supply-chain-risk-what-government-contractors-need-to-know
CBS News. (2026). Pentagon formally designates Anthropic a supply chain risk amid feud over AI guardrails. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pentagon-anthropic-supply-chain-risk-feud-ai-guardrails/
Oxford Academic. (2024). Can AI behave ethically during military crises? Preserving human moral agency. International Affairs, 102(1), 63–82. https://academic.oup.com/ia/article/102/1/63/8355995
Pearl Cohen. (2026). Anthropic sues Department of Defense over supply chain risk designation. https://www.pearlcohen.com/anthropic-sues-department-of-defense-over-supply-chain-risk-designation/
The Daily Economy. (2026). Anthropic vs. the Pentagon: AI ethics collide with government power. https://thedailyeconomy.org/article/anthropic-vs-the-pentagon-ai-ethics-collide-with-government-power/
Agility PR. (2026). Narrative risk in the AI era: Media lessons from the Anthropic–OpenAI Pentagon clash. https://www.agilitypr.com/pr-news/agility-news-reports/narrative-risk-in-the-ai-era-media-lessons-from-the-anthropic-openai-pentagon-clash/
Joannesuhandeniputri. (2026). The Anthropic Doctrine: When AI ethics met the Pentagon and lost. Medium. https://medium.com/@joannesuhandeniputri/the-anthropic-doctrine-when-ai-ethics-met-the-pentagon-and-lost-7dc811f9d2a8
ISMS.online. (n.d.). ISO 42001: Ultimate implementation guide 2025. https://www.isms.online/iso-42001/iso-42001-implementation-a-step-by-step-guide-2025/
Cloud Security Alliance. (2026). Pentagon vs. Anthropic: Autonomous weapons AI guardrails and the governance crisis for enterprise AI vendors. https://labs.cloudsecurityalliance.org/research/csa-research-note-dod-ai-guardrail-mandates-vendor-governanc/
Anadolu Agency. (2026). China ingatkan penggunaan AI militer AS dapat lemahkan batasan etika perang. https://www.aa.com.tr/id/ekonomi/china-ingatkan-penggunaan-ai-militer-as-dapat-lemahkan-batasan-etika-perang/3861223 https://www.cfr.org/articles/anthropics-standoff-with-the-pentagon-is-a-test-of-u-s-credibility
Wikipedia. (2026). Anthropic–United States Department of Defense dispute. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic%E2%80%93United_States_Department_of_Defense_dispute
